Adolescent Nutrition Articles & Resources

Parent-adolescent relationships are sometimes challenged when a youth has diabetes, which can create distress and a greater risk for engaging in health-compromising behaviors, including disordered eating habits (3,20). Parents are often unsure of appropriate limits for their youth with diabetes, which may increase family conflict. Maharaj et al. (18) reported that eating disturbances among youth with type 1 diabetes were associated with poor family communication, a lack of trust in the family, conflict, and inadequate support.

The present study expands upon the growing body of research examining weight control practices/disordered eating among youth with type 1 diabetes. The following specific research questions are addressed: 1) What types of weight control and disordered eating behaviors are used by adolescent females and males with type 1 diabetes? 2) Do unhealthy weight control behaviors differ by gender, age, parental level of education, weight status, or weight perception? 3) Does family structure (one versus two parents) or family functioning (cohesion, control, and/or independence) increase or reduce the risk of unhealthy weight control behaviors? and 4) What is the association between unhealthy weight control behaviors and glycosylated hemoglobin ([.1c])?

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Study population and design

Adolescents with type 1 diabetes who were followed at a Diabetes Clinic at Children's Hospital in St. Paul, MN, were invited to participate in the AHEAD study (Assessing Health and Eating among Adolescents with Diabetes). The AHEAD study comprised two phases: 1) a paper-pencil survey sent to all eligible youth being followed at the clinic and 2) in-depth interviews with a subsample of adolescents who completed the survey and one of their parents. The present study describes the first phase of the AHEAD study.

Participants were between the ages of 12 and 21 years and had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at least 1 year before study participation. Eligible participants under age 18 years and their parents were invited to participate in the study by the adolescents' physicians, either through a mailed letter or during a clinic visit. After receipt of signed informed parental consent and adolescent assent, adolescent participants were mailed a survey to complete. For eligible participants older than 18 years, similar procedures were used, but only adolescent informed consent (sent together with the survey) was required. To improve response rate and minimize bias, study staff mailed invitation packets to nonresponders on two additional occasions. Concurrently, clinic staff distributed invitation packets to potential participants during their clinic visits. All participants received a small monetary incentive for completing the survey. All study procedures were approved by both the University of Minnesota and the Chi ldren's Hospital/Clinic Institutional Review Boards.

Of a potential 246 adolescents who were being seen in the clinic, surveys were completed by 143 youth, yielding a response rate of 58%. Responders and nonresponders were compared for BMI, age, and [.1c] levels. Mean BMI values were similar for responders ( [+ or -] kg/[.2]) and nonresponders ( [+ or -] kg/[.2]) (P = ). However, responders tended to be older ( [+ or -] years) than nonresponders ( [+ or -] years) (P < 1). In addition, responders had lower [.1c] levels ( [+ or -] %) than nonresponders ( [+ or -] %) (P = ).

The study population was equally split on gender (females: n = 70, 49%; males: n = 73, 51%). The mean age of the study population was years (SD = ). The mean BMI of the population was kg/[.2] (SD = ). It is noteworthy that a large proportion of participants were overweight; 41% (n = 58) had a BMI greater than the 85th percentile; of these, 8% (n = 12) had a BMI greater than the 95th percentile. The majority of the participants (84%) lived in two-parent families, and more than half of participants (59%) reported that at least one parent had attained a level of education equivalent to a college degree or higher. While the majority of the population identified their race/ethnicity as white, the sample included 10% (n = 14) minority youth. This proportion is representative of the number of minority youth living in the geographic area of the study.

Measures

Items assessing weight perceptions and weight control behaviors were drawn from the Project EAT (Eating Among Teens) Survey (24). The Diabetes Eating Problems Survey (DEPS) (2) was used to further assess disordered eating attitudes and behaviors and manipulation of insulin for weight control purposes among the respondents. Adolescent-perceived family functioning was assessed using three subscales of the Family Environment Scale-Revised (FES- R): cohesion, independence, and control (21). These subscales were chosen because they assess constructs of interest to the research questions. Responsibility or diabetes management was assessed with the Diabetes and Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ) (1). The DFRQ assesses the adolescent's perceptions of who in the family (parent most of the time, adolescent most of the time, or both about equally) is responsible for 17 different diabetes-management tasks. Sociodemographic variables were based on self-report and included age, grade level, ethnicity, family struct ure, and parental educational level. BMI was based on the respondent's height and weight recorded during the medical visit that was closest to the date the adolescent filled out the survey. Metabolic control was assessed using the [.1c] value obtained at the medical visit that was closest to the date the adolescent filled out the survey. A more detailed description of each of these measures is included in Appendix A.

Data analysis

Demographic and weight control behavior frequencies were examined with cross-tabulations using the [chi square] as the test for significance. Frequency of weight-control categories (none, healthy, unhealthy, very unhealthy) was assessed separately by gender. Continuous scores on dependent variables were examined with means and were compared using ANOVA across demographic categories and categories of weight control behaviors. For all group comparisons, post hoc Tukey multiple comparison tests were conducted to assess differences between pairs of groups at P < . Two-tailed correlation coefficients between continuous variables were calculated using Pearson's r. Analyses controlling for age were also run. Patterns tended to be similar in age-adjusted analyses; therefore, these data are not presented. All analyses were completed using SPSS for the Macintosh, Version (36).

RESULTS

Prevalence of weight control/disordered eating behaviors

More female respondents (%) than male respondents (%) reported engaging in weight control behaviors over the past year to lose weight or keep from gaining weight (P < ). Disordered eating behaviors, as assessed with the DEPS, also tended to be higher among females than males, although differences were not statistically significant (females: [+ or -] %; males: [+ or -] %; P = ).

The frequencies for each of the specific weight control behaviors used by females and males are shown in Table 1. Healthy weight control behaviors were the most commonly reported practices, especially for females. Among the unhealthy behaviors used to control weight, skipping meals was used the most frequently. Of the very unhealthy weight control behaviors, % of the females reported skipping insulin, and % of the females reported taking less insulin as a way to control weight. Only one male reported engaging in any method of insulin mismanagement for weight control.

In classifying respondents into one of the four weight control behavior categories, % of females and % of males used no weight control behaviors, and % of females and % of males used only healthy weight control behaviors. Among females, % engaged in unhealthy weight control behaviors, and an additional % used very unhealthy behaviors to control their weight. For males, these last two categories of behaviors were less frequent with % and % reporting unhealthy behaviors and very unhealthy weight control behaviors, respectively.

Sociodemographic characteristics and weight control/disordered eating

When the categories of weight control behaviors (none, healthy only, unhealthy, and very unhealthy) were compared separately for females and males by age, parental level of education, and race, there were no differences between the categories (data not shown). Although the difference was not statistically significant, it is noteworthy that % of the nonwhite females (6 of 9) reported unhealthy or very unhealthy weight control behaviors in comparison to % of the white females (18 of 57). Similarly, associations between sociodemographic characteristics and disordered eating behaviors, as assessed with the DEPS, were not statistically significant (data not shown). Family structure was not associated with weight control behaviors or DEPS scores.

BMI, perceived weight, weight dissatisfaction, and weight control/disordered eating

For males, BMI differed by weight control behavior category; males in the very unhealthy weight control category had a significantly higher mean BMI than those in the other three categories (see Table 2). There were significant differences in weight perception by category of weight control behaviors for both females and males; respondents with more unhealthy weight control behaviors reported perceiving their weight as being heavier. Weight dissatisfaction differed significantly across the weight control behavior categories for females; those engaging in unhealthy behaviors reported the highest rates of weight dissatisfaction.

Slightly different patterns were found in examining associations between disordered eating behaviors, using scores from the DEPS, and BMI, weight perception, and weight dissatisfaction. Among females, DEPS scores were associated with weight dissatisfaction (r = ; P = ) but were not associated with BMI (r = ; P = ) or weight perception (r = ; P = ). Similarly, among males, DEPS scores were associated with weight dissatisfaction (r = ; P = ), but were not associated with BMI (r = ; P = ) or weight perception (r = ; P = ).

Family functioning and weight control/disordered eating

Family cohesion scores differed significantly between the weight control behavior categories among the females. Females using only healthy weight control behaviors reported the highest levels of family cohesion, while females using very unhealthy behaviors reported the lowest levels of family cohesion (see Table 3). Similarly, among the females, family cohesion was significantly associated with the DEPS scores (r = ; P < ). Other measures of the family social environment (control, independence, and responsibility for diabetes management) were not significantly different between the weight control behavior categories. The correlations between DEPS scores and the family environment were also nonsignificant.

Among the males, family cohesion did not differ significantly between the weight control behavior categories, although (like the females) the highest levels of family cohesion were reported by males using only healthy weight control behaviors, followed by males not using any weight control behaviors (see Table 3). For males, family cohesion was significantly associated with DEPS scores (r = ; P < ); males from more cohesive families reported fewer disordered eating behaviors. Other measures of family social environment (control, independence, and responsibility for diabetes management) were neither significantly different between weight control behavior categories nor correlated with DEPS scores.

[.1c] and weight control/disordered eating

Among females, there was a statistically significant difference between weight control behavior categories and laboratory measures of [.1c]; females reporting only healthy behaviors had significantly lower [.1c] levels than females reporting unhealthy weight control behaviors (see Table 4). The correlation between disordered eating behaviors (as assessed with the DEPS) and [.1c] levels also was statistically significant (r = ; P < ). Females reporting more disordered eating behaviors had poorer metabolic control, as evidenced by their higher [.1c] levels.

Among males, the difference between weight control behavior categories and [.1c] level was not statistically significant, although a trend similar to that found among females was noted. The correlation between DEPS scores and [.1c] levels for males was statistically significant (r = ; P < ).

CONCLUSIONS -- Weight control practices were prevalent among the study population. Although the use of healthy weight control behaviors was most commonly reported, significant percentages of females (37%) and males (15%) reported the use of unhealthy or very unhealthy behaviors. Of particular concern was the misuse of insulin for weight regulation, reported by 7-10% of the females. While prevalences of unhealthy weight control behaviors reported in this study are of concern, they were lower than those found in a recent large population-based survey of adolescents in the greater St. Paul/Minneapolis area, using similar questions (with the exception of insulin misuse) (24). Prevalences were also considerably lower than those found in an earlier population-based study of Minnesota youth who reported having diabetes (25), thus raising questions and concerns about the validity of making comparisons across studies, self-reported data on diabetes and on weight-control behaviors, and the representative nature of the study population in the current study.

Females who were more dissatisfied with their weight and who perceived themselves to be overweight were more likely to use unhealthy weight control behaviors. Among both genders, weight dissatisfaction was significantly correlated with disordered eating behaviors, as assessed with the DEPS; but associations between actual BMI and unhealthy weight control practices and disordered eating behaviors tended to be weak and inconsistent. Other studies have found positive associations between BMI and disordered eating among females with type 1 diabetes (9,43). Together these findings suggest that special attention should be directed toward helping youth who are overweight, and particularly those who express body dissatisfaction, to find healthy ways to control their weight and to avoid unhealthy methods, especially insulin misuse.

The high prevalence of overweight among the study population is noteworthy in that 44% of the females and 40% of the males had BMI values at or above the 85th percentile. Similarly, Engstrom et al. (9) found that youth with type 1 diabetes were at increased risk for overweight. This raises challenges for health providers in helping adolescents with type 1 diabetes to engage in healthy weight control behaviors, yet avoid excessive weight preoccupation and the use of unhealthy weight control behaviors.

Associations between weight control and disordered eating behaviors and different aspects of the family environment were examined in order to gain insight into the types of family relationship patterns that might place youth at risk, or serve to protect them, from engaging in unhealthy behaviors. Fairly strong associations were found with family cohesiveness, indicating the importance of family support. This finding is consistent with results reported by others about the importance of good family relationships for optimal diabetes management (11,18,35).

We did not find associations between the adolescents' weight control behaviors and the adolescents' perceptions of other aspects of the family environment, specifically family control or the encouragement of independence in individual family members. There was a tendency toward higher perceived family control by the females using the unhealthy weight control behaviors, and it could be that our sample was too small to detect significant differences on this variable. The two males who used very unhealthy weight control behaviors did report higher scores for family independence, but again the sample was too small to obtain statistical significance. One of the challenges of parenting an adolescent with type 1 diabetes is finding the right balance between encouraging youth responsibility for self-care and management of their diabetes as they mature into young adults, while simultaneously providing emotional support as they grapple with the meaning of having a chronic illness. These are important issues that need t o be examined in more depth, perhaps using qualitative research methodologies.

Unhealthy weight control and other disordered eating behaviors were associated with poorer metabolic control, as evidenced by higher [.1c] levels. This is consistent with the findings of others (8,13,32,41). The mean [.1c] levels of study participants were higher than the clinic goals for adolescents at the Diabetes Clinic, particularly among those who reported unhealthy and very unhealthy weight control practices. These findings suggest that even without a clinically significant eating disorder, the use of unhealthy weight control practices may have serious consequences for metabolic control among youth with type 1 diabetes.

This study had a number of strengths that increase the utility of the findings. The inclusion of males in the study population expands upon the current body of literature, as the majority of studies examining eating disorders/disordered eating among individuals with type 1 diabetes have included only females. The use of different measures of weight control practices/disordered eating and, in particular, the use of the DEPS (2), which is specific to diabetes, enhances our ability to draw conclusions from the data. In a review of the literature on eating disorders and type 1 diabetes, Nielson and Molbak (26) stress the importance of using diabetes-specific tools, since the use of general measures is "likely to lead to the loss of information." Other strengths include the assessment of both measured BMI and weight perceptions, [.1c] values, and different aspects of the familial social environment using previously validated tools (21).

A major study limitation was the relatively low response rate (58%), despite several attempts to reach the eligible clinic population. However, the attainment of data for BMI, age, and [.1c] levels for nonrespondents was helpful. The finding that nonrespondents had higher levels of [.1c] than respondents suggests that nonrespondents may have been more likely to engage in unhealthy weight control practices than respondents, but this cannot be stated with certainty. Thus, prevalence of data on unhealthy weight control behaviors among youth with type 1 diabetes should be interpreted cautiously. We would not expect associations (., with family functioning or metabolic control) to be affected by the response rate. Furthermore, although the study population was diverse in terms of gender, age, and SES, its small size and its homogeneity in terms of family structure and race/ethnicity make it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the lack of sociodemographic differences in weight control/diso rdered eating behaviors. Finally, the cross-sectional study design limits our ability to discuss causality. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess whether low family cohesion leads to the use of unhealthy weight control practices. That said, it is noteworthy that family connectedness has been shown to be a key factor influencing a range of health-compromising behaviors in population-based samples of youth (23,30,31).

Findings from the present study have implications for research and practice. The findings suggest a need for further research to explore the reasons that adolescents with type 1 diabetes engage in unhealthy weight control practices, despite the serious consequences of these behaviors. Of particular interest is the further exploration of familial factors in order to provide insight into helpful strategies for parenting an adolescent with type 1 diabetes. In addition, different types of treatment strategies should be evaluated in terms of their impact on weight-related behaviors. Our findings suggest that special attention should be directed toward females, youth with weight concerns, and youth from families with low levels of cohesiveness. A few screening questions regarding weight-related concerns and behaviors and regarding family relationships may be incorporated into clinic visits with adolescents. Some suggested introductory comments/questions include the following: "I would like to ask you few questions about any weight-related concerns you may have. How concerned are you about your weight, let's say on a scale from 0 (not at all concerned) to 10 (extremely concerned)? Are you on a diet now to lose or maintain weight?" If there appear to be weight-related concerns, the following questions may be asked "Do you ever skip meals to lose or maintain weight? In the past year, have you ever tried to lose weight by vomiting, taking diet pills, using laxatives, skipping insulin, or modifying your insulin dose?" Responses to these questions should be addressed within the treatment plan. Treatment strategies need to take into account the unique needs of teenagers in their quest for independence from their parents, the desire of most teenagers to "fit in" with their peers, and strong social norms emphasizing thinness. Support activities for families, such as family counseling or group work with parents of adolescents with diabetes, may enhance family cohesiveness and lead to improved diabetes management and outcomes. Fi nally, health care providers working with adolescents with type 1 diabetes may need special training in identifying disordered eating behaviors, addressing the developmental needs of adolescent populations, and working with families to enhance communication and support

APPENDIX A: DESCRIPTION OF MEASURES

Weight perceptions and weight control behaviors.

Items assessing weight perceptions and weight control behaviors were drawn from the Project EAT (Eating Among Teens) survey (24). The survey includes items assessing the following: 1) perception of current weight status-1 item (5-point Likert scale from very underweight to very overweight); 2) weight satisfaction-1 item (6-point Likert scale from very satisfied to very unsatisfied); 3) dieting frequency over the past year-1 item (5-point Likert scale from never to always dieting); 4) previous diagnosis of an eating disorder--1 item (yes/no); 5) binge eating behavior in past year-1 item (yes/no); and 6) 15 weight control behaviors to gain or lose weight over the past year, including skipping insulin or using less insulin than prescribed (yes/no). Based on responses to these 15 weight control items, respondents were classified into one of four weight control categories: very unhealthy, unhealthy, only healthy, or none (based upon the most severe weight control behaviors reported). Respondents were classified as "very unhealthy" if they did any of the following for weight control: took diet pills, vomited, skipped insulin dose(s), took less insulin than prescribed, used laxatives, or used diuretics. Respondents were classified as "unhealthy" if they did any of the following for weight control: fasted, ate very little food, used food substitutes (powder/special drink), skipped meals, and/or smoked more cigarettes. Respondents were classified as "hea thy" if they did any of the following for weight control: ate more fruits and vegetables, ate less high-fat foods, and ate less sweets. If respondents answered "no" for all 15 behaviors, they were included in the "none" category.

Diabetes Eating Problems Survey (DEPS).

The DEPS (2) was used to further assess disordered eating attitudes and behaviors and manipulation of insulin for weight control purposes among the respondents. The DEPS has reported predictive validity among diabetes patients diagnosed with an eating disorder; DEPS scores, as compared with EAT-26 scores, have been found to be more strongly correlated with diagnosed eating problems among females with type 1 diabetes (r = and , respectively) (2). For the present study, two questions regarding insulin omission/reduction for the purpose of weight control were added to the original version of the DEPS. A total score is derived by summing the 25 Likert-scaled items; scores can range from 25 to 150, with higher scores indicating more eating-related problems. The reliability estimate for the version of the DEPS used in the present study was .

Family Environment Scale-Revised (FES-R).

Adolescent-perceived family functioning was assessed using three subscales of the FES-R: cohesion, independence, and control (21). These subscales were chosen because they assess constructs of interest to the research questions. Two subscales (cohesion and control) have been linked with adolescent adjustment to diabetes (11,35), eating disorders (12,17), and other areas of adolescent health and psychosocial well-being (5,6,14,16). Each subscale comprises nine true-false items. The cohesion subscale assesses the extent to which family members are helpful and supportive of one another. The control subscale assesses rules and decision-making in the family. The independence subscale assesses the degree to which family members are encouraged and expected to do things on their own. In the present study population, [alpha] reliabilities for the cohesion and control subscales were acceptable ( and , respectively), but lower for the independence subscale (), although the latter [alpha] reliability varied b y age of respondent with higher values for older youth. Boyd et al. (4) calculated reliability estimates on the FES-R subscales using a large adolescent population (n = 1,217) and also found the cohesion and control reliability estimates to be higher ( and , respectively) than the independence estimate ().

Diabetes and Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ).

The DFRQ (1) includes 17 items assessing the adolescent's perceptions of who in the family (parent most of the time, adolescent most of the time, or both about equally) is responsible for a broad range of tasks involved in managing their diabetes. A total score (called "responsibility for diabetes management") is calculated by summing the items. A higher score indicates the adolescent is primarily responsible, a lower score suggests that the parent is primarily responsible, and a score in the middle indicates that, on average, responsibilities are shared between parent and adolescent. The reliability estimate (Cronbach's [alpha]) of the DFRQ in the present study population was satisfactory at .

Sociodemographic variables.

Adolescents reported their age, grade level, ethnicity, family structure, and parental educational level. Grade level was treated categorically and divided into four categories: 1) junior high (5th to 8th grade), 2) high school (9th to 12th grade), 3) college or technical school, and 4) not in school. Due to the small number of youth reporting an ethnicity other than "white" (n = 10), those who were Black/African-American, Hispanic/Latino, Asian American, or American Indian were grouped together as "nonwhite." Two groups were created for family structure: "two-parent family" and "other family structure." Four groups were created for parental education level: 1) did not finish high school; 2) finished high school, has a GED, or some college or technical training after high school; 3) finished college; and 4) completed Master's degree or PhD. Questions were asked separately for each parent, and the maximum educational level for either the mother or father was used in the analysis.

BMI.

BMI is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, and for the present study was based on the respondent's height and weight recorded during the medical visit that was closest to the date the adolescent filled out the survey. Medical visits during which heights and weights (and [.1c] values, described below) were collected were within 3 months of survey completion for 83% of the participants and within 6 months for 97% of them.

Metabolic control.

Metabolic control was assessed using the [.1c] value obtained at the medical visit that was closest to the date the adolescent filled out the survey. All blood samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The assay used is based on a latex immuno-agglutination inhibition methodology. [.1c] is a commonly used measure of metabolic control and represents the mean glucose concentration for the 6-8 weeks preceding the test. Higher [.1c] values indicate poorer metabolic control. In adolescents, the target [.1c] depends on stage of puberty. Targets used in the diabetes clinic where participants were receiving treatment are as follows: for early to middle puberty the target [.1c] is <%; for the late and postpubertal adolescent, the target [.1c] is <%; and for young adults over 18 years of age, the target [.1c] is <%. Fair control is considered within 1% of the target [.1c] on the high end. Beyond 1% of the target [.1c] is cons idered poor control.

Table 1

Specific weight control behaviors * used by adolescents with type 1
diabetes

 Females Males
 (N = 66) (N = 69)
 n % n %

Healthy behaviors
 Exercise 62 34 
 More fruits/vegetables 53 20 
 Less high-fat foods 50 22 
 Less sweets 46 24 
Unhealthy behaviors
 Fasted 5 1 
 Ate very little 16 4 
 Used food substitute 6 1 
 Skipped meals 19 5 
 Increased smoking 4 3 
Very unhealthy behaviors
 Diet pills 2 1 
 Vomited 2 0 --
 Skipped insulin 7 1 
 Used less insulin 5 1 
 Laxatives 2 0 --
 Diuretics 0 -- 0 --

* Reported using to "lose weight" or "keep from gaining weight" in past
year.
Table 2

Comparisons of BMI, weight perceptions, and dissatisfaction by weight
control behavior categories

 BMI
 n Mean SD

Females
 Weight control behavior
 category
 None 5 
 Only healthy 35 
 Unhealthy 11 
 Very unhealthy 12 
 P = 
Males
 Weight control
 behavior category
 None 32 (a) 
 Only healthy 26 (a) 
 Unhealthy 9 (a) 
 Very unhealthy 2 (b) 
 P = 

 Weight perception Weight
 dissatisfa
 ction
 Mean SD Mean

Females
 Weight control behavior
 category
 None (a) (a)
 Only healthy (a) (a)
 Unhealthy (ab) (ab)
 Very unhealthy (b) (b)
 P < 
Males
 Weight control
 behavior category
 None (a) 
 Only healthy (b) 
 Unhealthy (b) 
 Very unhealthy (ab) 
 P = 

 Weight
 dissatisfaction
 SD

Females
 Weight control behavior
 category
 None 
 Only healthy 
 Unhealthy 
 Very unhealthy 
 P = 
Males
 Weight control
 behavior category
 None 
 Only healthy 
 Unhealthy 
 Very unhealthy 
 P = 

Different are used to denote statistically significant differences (p <
) between categories using post hoc Tukey multiple comparison tests.
Table 3

Comparisons of family relationship patterns by weight control behavior
categories

 Family environment *
 Cohesion
 n + Mean SD

Females
 Weight control behavior
 categories
 None 4 (ab) ++ 
 Only healthy 35 (a) 
 Unhealthy 12 (b) 
 Very unhealthy 11 (b) 
 P < 
Males
 Weight control behavior
 categories
 None 30 
 Only healthy 25 
 Unhealthy 7 
 Very unhealthy 2 -
 P = 

 Family environment *
 Control Independen
 ce
 Mean SD Mean

Females
 Weight control behavior
 categories
 None 
 Only healthy 
 Unhealthy 
 Very unhealthy 
 P = 
Males
 Weight control behavior
 categories
 None 
 Only healthy 
 Unhealthy 
 Very unhealthy 
 P = 

 Family environment *
 Independence Diabetes and family
 SD responsibility *

Females
 Weight control behavior
 categories
 None 
 Only healthy 
 Unhealthy 
 Very unhealthy 
 P = P = 
Males
 Weight control behavior
 categories
 None 
 Only healthy 
 Unhealthy 
 Very unhealthy - 
 P = P = 


 Diabetes
 and family
 responsibi
 lity *

Females
 Weight control behavior
 categories
 None 
 Only healthy 
 Unhealthy 
 Very unhealthy 

Males
 Weight control behavior
 categories
 None 
 Only healthy 
 Unhealthy 
 Very unhealthy -


Different superscipts are used to denote statistically significant
differences (P < ) between categories using post hoc Tukey multiple
comparison tests.

* Potential ranges: Family environment scales (0-9); Diabetes and family
responsibility (17-51): higher scores, more adolescent responsibility.

+ Total n may differ slightly due to missing responses. Only one of the
two males reporting very unhealthy weight control behaviors had
responses for cohesion and diabetes management responsibility;
therefore, no SDs are given.

++ Different superscripts are used to denote statistically significant
differences (P < ) between categories using post hoc Tukey multiple
comparison tests.
Table 4

Comparisons of [.1c] levels by weight control behavior categories

 Females (n=65)
Weight control
behavior categories n Mean SD

None 5 (ab) * 
Healthy 36 (a) 
Unhealthy 11 (b) 
Very unhealthy 13 (ab) 
 p = 

 Males (n=66)
Weight control
behavior categories n Mean SD

None 31 
Healthy 25 
Unhealthy 8 
Very unhealthy 2 
 p = 

* Different superscripts are used to denote statisfully significant
differences (p < ) between categories using post hoc Tukey multiple
comparison tests.

Received for publication 4 December 2001 and accepted in revised form 30 April 2002.

.A. holds stock in Pfizer, Medtronic, and Genentech.

References

(1.) Anderson BJ, Auslander WF, Jung KC, Miller P, Santiago JV: Assessing family sharing of diabetes responsibilities. J Pediatr Psych 15:477-492, 1990

(2.) Antisdel JE, Laffel LMB, Anderson BJ: Improved detection of eating problems in women with type 1 diabetes using a newly developed survey (Abstract). Diabetes 50 (Suppl. 1):A47, 2001

(3.) Barber CJ, Lowes L: Eating disorders and adolescent diabetes: is there a link? Br J Nurs 7:398-402, 1998

(4.) Boyd CP, Gullone E, Needleman G, Burt T: The family environment scale: reliability and normative data for an adolescent sample. Fam Process 36:369-373, 1997

(5.) Brinson JA: Perceived family environment of Black adolescent alcohol users and nonusers. J Black Psychol 18:37-46, 1992

(6.) Burt CE, Cohen LH, Bjorck JP: Perceived family environment as a moderator of young adolescents' life stress adjustment. Am J Community Psychol 16:101-122,1988

(7.) Colas C, Mathieu P, Tchobroutsky G: Eating disorders and retinal lesions in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic women (Letter). Diabetologia 34:288, 1991

(8.) Crow SJ, Keel PK, Kendall D: Eating disorders and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Psychosomatics 39:233-243, 1998

(9.) Engstrom I, Kroon M, Arvidsson C-G, Segnestam K, Snellman K, Aman J: Eating disorders in adolescent girls with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a population-based case-control study. Acta Paediatrica 88:175-180, 1999

(10.) Gibbons KL, Wertheim EH, Paxton SJ, Petrovich J, Szmukler GI: Nutrient intake of adolescents and its relationship to desire for thinness, weight loss behaviours, and bulimic tendencies. Aust J Nutr Diet 52:69-74, 1995

(11.) Hauser ST, Jacobson AM, Wertlieb D, Brink S, Wentworth S: The contribution of family environment to perceived competence and illness adjustment in diabetic and acutely ill adolescents. Journal of Applied Family and Child Studies 34:99-108, 1985

(12.) Joiner GW: The multidetermined nature of bulimia nervosa in adolescent girls: a cross-cultural examination. Diss Ahstr Int 59:3697, 1999

(13.) Jones JM, Lawson ML, Daneman D, Olmsted MP, Rodin G: Eating disorders in adolescent females with and without type 1 diabetes: cross sectional study. Br Med J 320:1563-1566, 2000

(14.) Kleinman SL, Handal PJ, Enos D, Searight HR, et al: Relationship between perceived family climate and adolescent adjustment. J Clin Child Psychol 18:351-359, 1989

(15.) Koff E, Rierdan J: Perceptions of weight and attitudes towards eating in early adolescent girls. J Adolesc Health 12:307-312, 1991

(16.) Lau S, Kwok L-K: Relationship of family environment to adolescents' depression and self-concept. Social Behavior & Personality 28:41-50, 2000

(17.) Lee AM, Lee S: Disordered eating and its psychosocial correlates among Chinese adolescent females in Hong Kong. Int J Eat Disord 20:177-183, 1996

(18.) Maharaj SI, Rodin GM, Olmsted MP, Daneman D: Eating disturbances, diabetes and the family: an empirical study. J Psychosom Res 44:479-490, 1998

(19.) Marchi M, Cohen P: Early childhood eating behaviors and adolescent eating disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psych 29: 112-117, 1990

(20.) McConnell EM, Harper R, Campbell M, Nelson JK: Achieving optimal diabetic control in adolescence: the continuing enigma. Diabete Metab Res Rev 17:67-74, 2001

(21.) Moos RH, Moos BS: The Family Environment Scale-Revised. Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1986

(22.) Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Dixon LB, Resnick M, Blum R: Correlates of inadequate consumption of dairy products among adolescents. J Nutr Educ 29:12-20, 1997

(23.) Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Falkner N, Beuhring T, Resnick M: Disordered eating among adolescents with chronic illness: exploring the role of family and other social factors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 152: 871-878, 1998

(24.) Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Hannan, P, Perry C, Irving L: Weight-related concerns and behaviors among overweight and non-overweight adolescents: implications for preventing weight-related disorders. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 156: 171-178, 2002

(25.) Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Resnick M, Garwick A, Blum RW: Body dissatisfaction and unhealthy weight-control practices among adolescents with and without chronic illness: a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 149:1330-1335, 1995

(26.) Nielsen S, Molbak AG: Eating disorder and type 1 diabetes: overview and summing-up. European Eating Disorders Review 6:5-26, 1998

(27.) Patton GC, Johnson-Sabine, E, Wood K, Mann AH, Wakeling A: Abnormal eating attitudes in London schoolgirls--a prospective epidemiological study: outcome at twelve-month follow-up. Psychol Med 20:383-394, 1990

(28.) Peveler RC, Boller I, Fairburn CG, Dunger D: Eating disorders in adolescents with IDDM: a controlled study. Diabetes Care 15:1356-1360, 1992

(29.) Pollock M, Kovacs M, Charron-Prochownik D: Eating disorders and Maladaptive dietary/insulin management among youths with childhood-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 34:291-296, 1995

(30.) Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, Bauman KE, Harris KM, Jones J, Tabor J, Beuhring T, Sieving R, Shew M, Ireland M, Bearinger LH, Udry JR: Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA 278:823-832, 1997

(31.) Resnick MD, Harris LJ, Blum RW: The impact of caring and connectedness on adolescent health and well-being. J Paediatr Child Health 29:S3-S9, 1993

(32.) Rodin G, Craven J, Littlefield C, Murray M, Daneman D: Eating disorders and intentional insulin undertreatment in adolescent females with diabetes. Psychosomatics 32:171-176, 1991

(33.) Rodin GM, Daneman D: Eating disorders and IDDM: a problematic association. Diabetes Care 15:1402-1412, 1992

(34.) Rydall A, Rodine G, Olmsted M, Devenyi R, Daneman D: Disordered eating behavior and microvascular complications in young women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 336:1849-1854, 1997

(35.) Safyer AW, Hauser ST, Jacobson AM, Bliss R, Herskowitz RD, Wolfsdorf JI, Wertlieb D: The impact of the family on diabetes adjustment: a developmental perspective. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal 10:123-140, 1993

(36.) SPSS Inc.: SPSS 6:1 Base System User's Guide, Part 1 & 2 Macintosh Version. SPSS, Chicago, IL, 1994

(37.) Steel JM, Young RJ, Lloyd GG, Clark BF: Clinically apparent eating disorders in young diabetic women: associations with painful neuropathy and other complications. Br Med J 294:259-862, 1987

(38.) Stice E, Cameron RP, Killen JD, Hayward C, Taylor CB: Naturalistic weight-reduction efforts prospectively predict growth in relative weight and onset of obesity among female adolescents. scents. J Consult Clin Psychol 67:967-974, 1999

(39.) Stice E, Hayward C, Cameron RP, Killen JD, Taylor CB: Body image and eating related factors predict onset of depression in female adolescents: a longitudinal study. J Abnormal Psychol 109:438-444, 2000

(40.) Striegel-Moore RH, Nicholson TJ, Tamborlane WV: Prevalence of eating disorder symptoms in preadolescent and adolescent girls with IDD M. Diabetes Care 15:1361-1368, 1992

(41.) Takii M, Komaki G, Uchigata Y, Maeda M, Omori Y, Kubo C: Differences between bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder in females with type 1 diabetes: the important role of insulin omission. J Psychosom Res 47:221-231, 1999

(42.) Verrotti A, Catino M, De Luca FA, Morgese G, Chiarelli F: Eating disorders in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol 36:21-25, 1999

(43.) Vila G, Robert J-J, Nollet-Clemencon C, Vera L, Crosnier H, Rault G, Jos J, Moureen-Simeoni M-C: Eating and emotional disorders in adolescent obese girls with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 4:270-279, 1995

Abbreviations: AHEAD, Assessing Health and Eating among Adolescents with Diabetes; DEPS, Diabetes Eating Problems Survey; DFRQ, Diabetes and Family Responsibility Questionnaire; EAT, Eating Among Teens Survey; FES-R, Family Environment Scale-Revised.

A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Systeme International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, PHD (1)

Joan Patterson, PHD (1)

Alison Mellin, PHD (1)

Diann M. Ackard, PHD (2)

Jennifer Utter, MPH (1)

Mary Story, PHD (1)

Joseph Sockalosky, MD (3)

(1.) Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

(2.) Private Practice, Golden Valley, Minnesota.

(3.) Children's Hospitals and Clinics, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, PhD, MPH, RD, Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota, 1300 South 2nd St. #300, Minneapolis, MN 55454. E-mail: .edu.